But does this entail that a vice is being committed by simply using ones right? Cases including unprotected, uncoerced sex, cases involving rape, cases involving protected sex, and cases involving both married and single women. Those who support the right of a woman to an abortion even after the final trimester makes the assertion that the Constitution does not provide any legal rights for a child that is still within the motherâs womb. It is therefore important to protect hapless fetuses and babies in this country. The comparison is valuable in that it’s an in-between case, like a fetus: most would probably agree it has more moral value than a lump of indeterminate matter and some kind of human sanctity (on “sanctity”: http://aaronsholymountain.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/on-an-argument-for-conservatism/) worthy of respect, but less than a fully formed, sentient person. However, pro-choice groups made the counter-argument that a woman has control of her own body. Further, what about the person who needs guidance if they engaged in actions that brought about less than ideal circumstances. I enjoy engaging even if both parties don’t always see eye to eye ð. There is no absolute right as the law stands for a woman to do what she likes with her own body and have abortion on demand. I’ll just comment on this part because I feel we’re just getting closer to an impasse – haha. Rosalind Hursthouse argued that virtue ethics is the preferable moral philosophy for determining the moral permissibility of abortion because it avoids the drawbacks from the utilitarian approach, and the deontological approach. (2) One issue here is obviously that Iâm very reluctant to grant it is a full life even just for the sake of argument. http://www.amazon.ca/Right-Action-Virtue-Justin-Caouette/dp/3847340336, http://aaronsholymountain.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/on-an-argument-for-conservatism/, ‘A Philosopher’s Take’ Year in Review (2014) | A Philosopher's Take, https://lagevondissen.wordpress.com/2015/08/10/why-i-became-a-pro-choice-advocate/, Follow A Philosopher's Take on WordPress.com, Discovery and Invention Part I: Distinctions and Notations, Free Will: Why Sam Harris needs to read more Philosophy. Abstract: This essay explicates and evaluates the roles that fetal metaphysics and moral status play in Rosalind Hursthouse’s abortion ethics.It is motivated by Hursthouse’s puzzling claim in her widely anthologized paper Virtue Ethics and Abortion that fetal moral status and (by implication) its underlying metaphysics are in a way, fundamentally irrelevant to her position. The goal must be the development of character and the appropriate inner state. Regardless, this line of questioning and these types of considerations bring us into a completely different sort of argument, one I hope to address in the coming weeks, dealing with the value of life, particularly how we ought to value the life of a fetus. The choice is easier when it comes to the possibility that mother and child cannot survive if an abortion is not performed. However, this particular post is trying to uncover what the Virtue Ethicist could say if in fact the fetus had moral value, and to that end I don’t think they could say that killing an innocent life (if the life has value) is the best act or the right act in most cases(cases where the mother’s life is at risk aside), if not all. In this stage of introspection â using the virtue ethics framework â it is possible that some of the women contemplating on terminating their pregnancy will come to realize that they wanted abortion for no other reason than to get rid of the fetus because it is an obstacle to financial and career success. I begin by outlining virtue ethics in comparison to the two other dominant approaches in normative ethics. Aristotle is pro-abortion. However there are presumably cases where this is acceptable – to solve a murder case, retrieve something especially valuable from the grave etc. Therefore, she has the right to terminate her pregnancy. Being a Virtue Ethicist, or at least identifying more closely with VE than to other ethical approaches, I’ve concluded that to choose an abortion over other courses of action (if you’re a Virtue Ethicist) is to make a wong decision. IvyPanda. I think that the concern for virtue ethicists, is not necessarily what rights someone has, but rather what they “should” do when confronted with certain situations? This is especially true for those who cannot fight for themselves. It contains thousands of paper examples on a wide variety of topics, all donated by helpful students. With regards to your last suggestion – I think that it would be a knock against virtue ethics if they would appealed to your suggestion as a way around dealing with the decision to abort. Here is a second consideration, especially relevant since I know Hursthouse has an aversion to dealing in abstract or isolated moral scenarios (I am an ex student): any case of pregnancy has its circumstances which a person or two people with certain character constitutions are responsible for. I’ll re-post here to remind you of the purpose; “If one thinks that the fetus is not deserving of moral consideration or does not have any moral worth thatâs one thing and a very different sort of debate, but, if we make the assumption that Judith Jarvis Thompson does in her seminal work âA Defense of Abortionâ and assume the fetus is a person, or that the fetus ought to be morally considered (for the sake of argument) then when can the Virtue Ethicist claim that aborting the fetus is the right action when other options like adoption or parenting the child yourself are available? This is why I find VE to be superior to other leading theories. December 6, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/abortion-and-virtue-ethics/. Instead of focusing on doing the right thing, this ethical framework enables the person to focus on a goal. The database is updated daily, so anyone can easily find a relevant essay example. I agree that virtues are context sensitive and pluralistic in how they can be applied (which is why a 2200 yr old ethical theory can still be applied today) but VE doesn’t collapse into some sort of relativism. Thus, there is freedom of choice and there is no room for regrets. What am I. SO, as it stands, we’re back to the initial question. IvyPanda. This is why the moral status of the fetus is in fact relevant, and why science is essential to the issue. This essay on Abortion and Virtue Ethics was written and submitted by your fellow student. This awareness leads to another realization that terminating their pregnancy at this point in their lives does not guarantee that they will not need another abortion in the near future. If there is a 20 year old, in college, on a scholarship, got violently raped. With regards to the perpetrator being virtuous or not, I guess it would depend on hy he was engaging in the action. We will write a custom Essay on Abortion and Virtue Ethics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page. Doing a case study for my class….wanted to know if it made sense or I’m on the wrong path. According to Rosalind Hursthouse, an action is right (from a Virtue Ethical perspective)Â if and only if it is what the virtuous agent would do in the same circumstances. New York: Rosen Publishing. I think, as I stated in my initial post, the Virtue Ethicist will have a hard time telling that sort of story, and, I don’t think that story would adhere to the traditional Aristotelian notion of eudamonia or a flourishing life. I’m also an old school Virtue Ethicist which is why I used Hursthouse as my starting point. If we assume that the fetus is a person, or has moral value from conception (which Thomson does for the sake of argument), then I think the virtue ethicist will have a tough time saying that abortion is the “right” act all things considered. The promotion of caring relationships requires both the support and * Jonathan Herring, Professor Law, University of Oxford. In other words, flourishing is defined in terms of embodying the virtues. A fetus has no power over doctors and women who view them as inconveniences rather than human beings. Any further ideas as to what virtues to act by in this case are welcomed. If I get pregnant, and get an abortion in a few months, am I not acting as a virtuous person would act? For instance, legal experts are unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a three month old fetus does not have the capability to feel and hear the various biological stimuli that occurs outside the womb. What type of assignment ð do you need? The legal justification is based on a Supreme Court ruling in 1973 â Roe vs. Wade â wherein the Supreme Court Justices agreed that women have a choice regarding their pregnancy and if they want to terminate it or not. The Aristotlean view of human reproduction (erroneously) postulated that there was a fully formed human being in the seminal fluid. Each narrative is connected with other narratives and other narratives play a part in how we make decisions. Been a year since your comment but I guess time is relative lol so I’ll feel free and pitch in a response to your post. It is not necessarily the case that they will always be concerned with acting on their own rights. With regards to the virtue ethicist defining “what life consists in”, I guess I’m not sure exactly what you’re getting at here. ), thus producing some number of abortions and some pregnancies carried to term, the virtue ethicist framework would approach the issue of the being or character of the person doing the behavior. The logical explanation of legal experts in Roe vs. Wade is full of glaring weaknesses. It is about having the âappropriate inner statesâ (Athanassoulis, p.1). Virtue ethics like many other ethical theories, tries to answer the questions: (A) How should one live? It is critically important to consider both character and the inner-state of the woman. But here, I was admittedly vague, and my question to start was a bit malformed so here is my attempt to be a bit more clear. By Jacob Countryman. It is a procedure that a woman can avail because she owns her body, so the argument goes. What about cases of rape? Whatâs your deadline? This is sort of a meta-virtue-ethicist argument. The pro-life groups have the right to contest the judgment made by the US Supreme Court because this is a nation established on the ideals of freedom and human rights. abortion may very well be prudent, show your commitment to your existing children etc. I then consider what some important virtue ethicists have said about abortion, especially the work of Rosalind Hursthouse. The woman already is well-acquainted with a full-grown fetus inside of her. This argument makes sense when a pregnancy threatens the life of a pregnant woman. Now, personhood debates get a bit dicey. So, to answer how one should act when pregnant by saying they shouldn’t have had sex is not very helpful at all. However, abortion prior to the third trimester is legal in many areas in the United States of America. Because it focuses on one’s character, why they chose to perform the action, and doesn’t focus primarily on the outcome of that action (consequentialism) or some arbitrary rule (deontology). A virtuous characteristic, when looking at the case of abortion, is incontrovertibly complex. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. 7 July 2010 Web. His conception of a flourishing life and the virtue model is just as easily applied to women as to men, even if HE couldn’t see that. Thoughts? That’s a tough one. Since you claimed personhood is the best approach, let’s discuss it. why hursthouse thinks that a virtue theorist will not be overly concerned with whether or not women have a right to an abortion ? With that said, I’m not convinced by the clump of cells line of argument. I tend to agree with your argument. “Yes, Aristotle thought highly of only women…” – you must be having me on here. Finally, in light of these criticisms I attempt to extend a virtue ethics analysis to embrace a more robust recognition of the humanity of the fetus and the attendant demand of a near absolute prohibition on abortion. However, this ethical framework reminds everyone that the freedom to choose is useless if the decisions made does not build character and help people become the best that they could be. If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. I think we are at an impasse, though. We must consider what is fact and what is conception, and in many cases, misconception. As I stated, I don’t think they could claim that abortion is permissible in most cases. Again, I’ve researched such arguments and don’t find any of them compelling–at all. ð ). It is motivated by Hursthouse’s puzzling claim in her widely anthologized paper “Virtue Ethics and Abortion” that fetal moral status and (by implication) its underlying metaphysics are … Metaethics must have shifted. I haven’t considered the legal aspect of things here. By doing so every woman desiring to terminate pregnancy is given a choice. Chapter 24: Active and Passive Euthanasia: A Reply to Rachels . However I would say, and if I remember correctly Hursthouse says, virtue ethics doesn’t really deal in the technicalities of defining exactly what life consists in. These women are convinced that an unexpected pregnancy can derail their plans. Well, if the foetu… Virtue Theory and Abortion. However, it could be argued that christian virtues are really either vices of deficiency or excess when seen through Aristotle, who is after all the father of virtue ethics and ethics in general (that is big of me to say because I am a big Plato fanboy). Murder must not be taken lightly especially when viewed from the perspective of a hapless human being trapped in the womb of a woman who can decide that this unborn child is an inconvenience that must be discarded. For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Again, the status of the foetus is key here. This is IvyPanda's free database of academic paper samples. I’ll only say that you’re right, I’m not sympathetic to it (maybe somewhat sympathetic, though). But obviously the question of when the life actually becomes of moral value still matters and in cases) where the fetus could be aborted prior to conciousness (at least that’s where i draw my line the VE can still do so. I guess I’m not seeing how a decision not to abort could be a vice (as you mentioned it could). (One issue here is obviously that I’m very reluctant to grant it is a full life even just for the sake of argument.). I was focused on a particular argument and one particular ethical stance; the argument by Judith Jarvis Thompson and a virtue ethical stance. It doesn’t seem that the VE can claim that a virtuous person would abort the baby if we have already accepted that the baby’s life is of significant moral value. Again, thanks for your comments.
Raspberry Leaves For Stallions, Saying I Love You First And Not Hearing It Back, Canon Powershot Sx740 Mic Input, Ficus Maclellandii Care, Whitetop Road Virginia, Importance Of Scientific Innovation In Art And Design, Manufacturing Engineering Magazine, Stanley Brick Hammer, God Of Winter,